Os Piores Apocalipses (Não Zumbis) da Ficção | Ranqueados em 5 Pilares
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
Portfolio
6 work samples retained from a reported 46-video portfolio. Each credit shows where it came from.
Qual o Assassino mais Eficiente e Profissional da Ficção?
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
As PRISÕES mais INESCAPÁVEIS da Ficção (Ranqueadas Matematicamente)
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
Qual o Melhor Sistema de Poder da Ficção? (Analisando Sistematicamente)
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
A Maior ADAPTABILIDADE da Ficção (Ranqueada por Matemática)
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
Os Personagens Mais TEMIDOS da Ficção! (Ranqueados matematicamente)
Historical credit: what this means
A retained source record links this person and role to the video. It has not been independently re-verified.
About these numbers
- Videos reported in the source portfolio
- 46Reported by the historical source. Only 6 of them were retained and appear above.
- Views reported for the portfolio
- 5.9MThe source’s total for this person’s listed videos, from an unknown date. It counts public views of those videos, not views this person generated, and is not a live figure.
- Channels associated
- 2Channels linked to this profile in the source record. An association is not a confirmed working relationship.
Reviews
All reviewsE★★★★★
EnderBits
Jun 27, 2026Muito capricho e vontade de fazer bem feito todos os vídeos, sempre buscando melhor retenção e qualidade para o espectador 👏
Retained source review